Why do large companies centralize recruitment via MSP? Vendor sprawl, compliance chaos, and slow time-to-fill kill efficiency at scale.

When you’re hiring 50+ contractors yearly across IT, engineering, and consulting, individual agencies create overlap, blind spend, and compliance gaps. Large organizations centralize via MSP to cut costs 20%, speed up time-to-fill, and get one dashboard for everything. It’s not optional at scale—it’s survival.
Let’s be honest: scale breaks everything
Managing 3 agencies feels fine. At 15? You lose control. Spend balloons. Time-to-fill stretches. Large organizations hit this wall fast, and MSP is how they climb out.
Vendor sprawl means 10-20+ agencies sending overlapping candidates, negotiating separate fees, and creating invisible spend. At scale, it wastes 20-30% of budget and stretches time-to-fill from 14 to 28+ days.
MSP consolidates 15 vendors into 3-5 best-in-class with master pricing and SLAs. Clients typically save 18-25% through overlap elimination, unified rates, and spend visibility—no more paying Agency A and B for the same candidate.
No. MSP orchestrates external suppliers (contractors, freelancers, project hires) while your team handles permanent roles. It's the control layer above fragmented agencies, not a replacement for your TA function.
Around 50+ contractors yearly, €250k+ external spend, or 10+ active vendors. Below that, agencies work. Above it, MSP governance saves more than the setup cost.
4-8 weeks: vendor audit, consolidation to 3-5 partners, contract harmonization, dashboard build. After that? One point of contact replaces 15 relationships permanently.
Each agency handles GDPR, certifications, and right-to-work differently. MSP centralizes it: pre-vetted vendors, real-time dashboards, one audit report. One non-compliant hire across 100 contractors costs six figures.
By subscribing to our newsletter, you agree to receive communications in accordance with our privacy policy.