Graduate recruitment is a cohort exercise rather than a series of searches. You hire several people at once, compare them against each other, start them together, and find out two years later whether it worked. In Belgium the instrument that lets you train someone before committing is regional, and it is not the same one in Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels.
Of the candidates we place are promoted within eighteen months. On early careers hiring that number matters more than time to fill does.
IBO in Flanders, PFI in Wallonia, FPIE in Brussels. You can only use the one for your region.
Where the Belgian first-employment regime ends, at the close of that quarter.
Cohort and intake planning
How many, from where, starting when.
Campus and school relations
Built before the season, not during it.
Assessment centres
Candidates compared against each other.
Regional training schemes
IBO, PFI or FPIE, depending on the site.
Synchronised intake
One start date and one onboarding.
Progression path design
Because retention is the real measure.
Retention tracking
At twelve, eighteen and twenty-four months.
Cohort logic
Six graduates hired one at a time across a year produce six onboardings, six sets of expectations and no peer group. Hired together, they compare themselves to each other rather than to a senior colleague, which is most of what keeps them.
Comparable candidates
With no work history to read, a CV tells you where someone studied and very little else. An assessment centre puts candidates in the same exercise on the same day, which is the only way to compare people who have not worked yet.
Retention you can measure
Tracked at twelve, eighteen and twenty-four months rather than declared at the start date. A graduate intake that looks successful in month three and empty in month twenty was not successful.
Cheaper intake
Regional training schemes let you train someone on the job before the employment contract starts, with the public employment service carrying part of the cost. Most foreign-owned subsidiaries we work with have never used the one available to them.
Cohort with us | In-house campus | Job boards | Interns first | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How you find them | Campus, schools and direct approach | Your own school relationships | Whoever applies to the advert | People who found you already |
| How you compare | One assessment centre, side by side | Interviews, role by role | Screening on where they studied | On the job, over months |
| Start dates | One intake wave | Whenever each one is ready | Scattered across the year | Tied to the academic year |
| Cost structure | Per cohort, schemes applied | Your team's time | Cheap per post, costly in time | Low, but slow to convert |
| Fits when | Three or more juniors in a year | You already have the relationships | One junior role, no cohort | You can wait a full cycle |
Below three, hire them one at a time. From three up, a cohort is cheaper and holds better.
Cohort and scheme planning
How many people, which profiles, which site, and which regional training scheme is available there.
Sourcing and campus work
School and university channels, direct approach, and a process built for people with no work history.
Assessment centre
Candidates in the same exercises on the same day, scored against the same criteria by the same people.
Intake and first two years
One start date, one onboarding, and a progression path agreed before anyone arrives. We check in at twelve, eighteen and twenty-four months, because a cohort that empties in year two tells you something the start date never did.
Of the candidates we place are promoted within eighteen months. On early careers hiring that number matters more than time to fill does.
IBO in Flanders, PFI in Wallonia, FPIE in Brussels. You can only use the one for your region.
Where the Belgian first-employment regime ends, at the close of that quarter.
Software and application
Deep graduate supply, and skills that develop fast enough to justify the investment.
Data and business intelligence
A field young enough that a graduate is not automatically behind an experienced hire.
Business analysis
Trainable from a standing start, and a good route into the rest of the organisation.
Finance and controlling
Structured enough to teach, with a clear progression ladder graduates can see.
Mechanical and structural
Where training schemes pay for themselves fastest, because ramp-up is long.
Customer operations
High cohort volumes, where the peer group is what stops first-year attrition.

Technology and innovation
Where graduates expect a visible path, and leave quickly when they cannot see one.
Financial services
Long-established graduate programmes, competing against each other for the same shortlists.
Automotive and manufacturing
Where a training scheme covers a genuinely long ramp-up rather than a formality.
There is no work history to assess, so the usual evidence is missing and a CV mostly tells you where someone studied. That pushes the assessment into structured exercises rather than interviews. And the measure of success moves: a graduate intake is judged on who is still there and progressing after two years, not on how quickly the seats were filled.
The one for the region where the training happens, not where your head office is. Flanders has IBO through VDAB, Wallonia has PFI through Forem, Brussels has FPIE through Bruxelles Formation. A Brussels company cannot use the Flemish scheme and the reverse is equally true. Each lets you train someone in the workplace before an employment contract starts, with the public service carrying part of the cost.
Until the end of the quarter in which the person turns 26. Whether they have worked before, including under a previous first-employment agreement, does not matter. Within that window they can work for any number of employers, and an employer can take on as many young people as it wants. It is a wider definition of young talent than most companies use internally.
Yes, but for a different reason than before. Since 1 August 2026 a Belgian permanent contract can be ended on one week's notice during the first six months, so a scheme is no longer mainly a way to avoid committing. What it still does is shift part of the training cost of a long ramp-up onto the public employment service. Where the ramp-up is short, hire directly. Where it is genuinely six months, the scheme still pays.
Through work samples and exercises rather than through questions about hypothetical situations. Candidates do the same tasks on the same day, scored on the same criteria by the same assessors, so the comparison is between candidates rather than between interviewers. It also produces a written record of why each decision was made, which matters more at cohort volume than on a single hire.
Almost never pay, in our experience. It is the absence of a visible next step. A graduate who cannot name the role after this one starts looking around month fourteen, and the market will find them. This is the uncomfortable part of the conversation: if the progression path does not exist, a better recruitment process will only bring you better people to lose.
Tell us how many juniors you need this year, for which teams and at which sites. You get a written view of the cohort, the schemes available to you, and whether the progression path holds.